🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – appears to require demands a PhD in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Costly

According to recent research, typical households pays $27,000 annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now the government is shut down because partisan disputes regarding subsidies that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. How our healthcare providers receive payment would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would need contributions from both employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker making average wages pays about five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute about 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you compare it to what average US resident spends. I know dozens of businesses who are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with supporting healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

In the US, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and employer contribution. Similar to much of federal military, IT, social programs and transportation services, the program should be outsourced by private contractors instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would render management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make simpler to plan expenses our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complex (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to interpret the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't have access to workers' medical records for risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in society, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It's a better, easier system for small businesses that employ more than half of American employees and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and more affordable strategy both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect amid current situation is that we take a hard look in the mirror and agree that major reforms are necessary.